Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Miguel Damas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Damas analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Miguel Damas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 47.84% of points on his second serve, while Damas has won 51.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damas has won 55.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.23% and 37.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 61.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damas has saved 53.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Damas winning 54.69% (W/L 35/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Damas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 119/ 80), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 28/ 18), where as Damas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.88% of matches (W/L 23/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marchenko winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 2 and Damas winning 1. The last match between Marchenko and Damas was at the Segovia Challenger, 29-07-2019, First, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Damas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Marchenko winning 1 times and Damas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 1, and Damas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 322.78 while Damas has played against players with an average rank of 270.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damas has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 36.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damas has converted 45.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 1 - 0 Damas
242
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
524
Rank
412
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
57% (598-446)
Career Total W/L
57% (169-129)
25% (4-12)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:1:0 | 3:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (66/116) | 64% (72/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (54/66) | 76% (55/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (24/50) | 41% (17/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (41/113) | 33% (38/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 7-6(8) 6-2 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Miguel Damas
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
7
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
6
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (4/12) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 32% (12/26) | 50% (23/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (175/206) | 52% (218/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:59 | 1:54:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.38 | 232.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (717/1273) | 60% (827/1376) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (495/717) | 61% (503/827) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (266/556) | 53% (289/549) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (35/95) | 47% (79/168) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (429/1212) | 44% (601/1359) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (3/9) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (4/16) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 33% (12/4) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Miguel Damas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Richard Zusman
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Miguel Damas
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
12
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
71 of
128)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Nino Serdarusic
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
30
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Miguel Damas
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Miguel Damas
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Miguel Damas
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Miguel Damas
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Damas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Miguel Damas
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
