Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Miguel Damas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Damas analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Miguel Damas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marchenko 1 - 0 Damas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50.35% of points on his second serve, while Damas has won 51.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damas has won 53.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.5% and 37.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damas has saved 54.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 59.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 25), with Damas winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Damas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 122/ 83), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Damas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.44% of matches (W/L 25/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marchenko winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 2 and Damas winning 1. The last match between Marchenko and Damas was at the Segovia Challenger, 29-07-2019, First, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-7(6) 7-6(8) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Damas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Marchenko winning 1 times and Damas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 1, and Damas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.11 while Damas has played against players with an average rank of 265.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damas has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damas has converted 43.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
216
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
471
Rank
412
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (602-447)
Career Total W/L
57% (172-132)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:1:0 | 3:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (66/116) | 64% (72/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (54/66) | 76% (55/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (24/50) | 41% (17/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (41/113) | 33% (38/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 7-6(8) 6-2 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Miguel Damas
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
7
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
6
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (21/30) | 50% (30/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (242/266) | 51% (274/262) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:40 | 1:55:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 267.95 | 218.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (939/1662) | 62% (1079/1746) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (659/939) | 62% (665/1079) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (364/723) | 51% (341/667) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (47/141) | 43% (95/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (586/1633) | 44% (776/1768) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 50% (12/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 33% (15/5) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Miguel Damas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Miguel Damas
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Miguel Damas
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
70
|
0-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Nicola Kuhn
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
35
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Miguel Damas
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
88)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Richard Zusman
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Miguel Damas
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
12
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
71 of
128)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Damas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
