Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ivan Gakhov vs Marvin Moeller Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gakhov vs Moeller analysis and find out who is favored!
Ivan Gakhov vs Marvin Moeller Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gakhov has won 46.17% of points on his second serve, while Moeller has won 51.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gakhov, in recent form, has won 49.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Moeller has won 51.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.13% and 35.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gakhov has saved 64.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Moeller has saved 58.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gakhov has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Moeller winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 403/ 231), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Moeller has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 60/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Moeller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.56% of matches (W/L 29/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gakhov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gakhov winning 2 and Moeller winning 0. The last match between Gakhov and Moeller was at the Spain F8 (Reus), 22-03-2017, Second, Clay with Ivan Gakhov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gakhov and Moeller have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gakhov winning 0 times and Moeller 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gakhov winning 1, and Moeller 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gakhov has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.76 while Moeller has played against players with an average rank of 238.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gakhov has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Moeller has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gakhov has converted 44.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Moeller has converted 42.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gakhov 1 - 0 Moeller
274
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
308
Rank
296
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
61% (465-296)
Career Total W/L
62% (168-102)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$56,825
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ivan Gakhov | Marvin Moeller |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (44/71) | 48% (31/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 48% (15/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 52% (17/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (32/64) | 35% (25/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Marvin Moeller
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ivan Gakhov | Marvin Moeller |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 50% (7/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (23/29) | 55% (18/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (254/262) | 50% (162/160) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (8/11) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 104 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:35 | 1:45:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 239.83 | 308.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1002/1707) | 66% (667/1010) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (698/1002) | 66% (439/667) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (328/705) | 50% (171/343) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (62/139) | 42% (45/108) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (639/1670) | 41% (428/1056) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Ivan Gakhov
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Marco Cecchinato
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Marvin Moeller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Oskar Jansson
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Marvin Moeller
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Marvin Moeller
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Marvin Moeller
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Marvin Moeller
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
77%
(
86 of
111)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Filip Krajinovic
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Marvin Moeller
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gakhov Vs Moeller Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Marvin Moeller
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
