Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Hassan analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Benjamin Hassan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 50.99% of points on his second serve, while Hassan has won 51.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 50.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hassan has won 51.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.7% and 28.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 64.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hassan has saved 60.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 66.07% of matches played (W/L 37/ 19), with Hassan winning 58.62% (W/L 51/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 176/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8), where as Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.94% of matches (W/L 39/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Draper winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Hassan winning 1. The last match between Draper and Hassan was at the Potchefstroom 2 Challenger, 15-02-2021, Q3, Hard with Jack Draper getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:48:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Hassan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Draper winning 1 times and Hassan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Hassan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.8 while Hassan has played against players with an average rank of 273.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hassan has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 50.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hassan has converted 39.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 0 Hassan
40
Rank
37
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
147
Rank
147
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
69% (201-91)
Career Total W/L
60% (280-184)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
45% (13-16)
$1,468,300
Career Prize Money
$133,940
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jack Draper | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:48:49 | 2:48:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (53/102) | 58% (75/129) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (34/53) | 56% (42/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (20/49) | 41% (22/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (9/21) | 58% (7/12) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (65/129) | 47% (48/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Benjamin Hassan
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
75 of
129)
2
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
65 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 45% (13/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (33/25) | 47% (32/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (298/250) | 50% (327/325) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 151 | 132 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:47 | 1:30:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 101.33 | 256.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (975/1679) | 58% (1135/1959) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (740/975) | 70% (794/1135) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (353/704) | 53% (437/824) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (73/144) | 40% (63/159) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (633/1663) | 37% (717/1936) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 45% (13/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 19% (16/3) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Jack Draper
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jack Draper
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
118)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
55 of
116)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
10
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Draper Vs Hassan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
