Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacopo Berrettini vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berrettini vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacopo Berrettini vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berrettini has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berrettini, in recent form, has won 53.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.89% and 29.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berrettini has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 58.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berrettini has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 10/ 9), with Fanselow winning 61.63% (W/L 53/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berrettini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 76/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Berrettini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Berrettini winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Berrettini winning 1 and Fanselow winning 2. The last match between Berrettini and Fanselow was at the Lisbon Challenger, 27-09-2021, Q3, Clay with Sebastian Fanselow getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Berrettini and Fanselow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Berrettini winning 0 times and Fanselow 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Berrettini winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berrettini has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.89 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 228.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berrettini has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berrettini has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 34.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Berrettini 0 - 1 Fanselow
790
Rank
389
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
54% (180-152)
Career Total W/L
61% (353-230)
59% (10-7)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$29,455
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Berrettini VS Fanselow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jacopo Berrettini | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:21 | 2:31:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (52/91) | 68% (74/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (37/52) | 66% (49/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (20/39) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (41/109) | 37% (34/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Berrettini VS Fanselow H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacopo Berrettini | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (10/7) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (20/19) | 49% (34/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (196/194) | 50% (346/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 141 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:50 | 1:48:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.59 | 225.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (734/1236) | 58% (1259/2163) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (461/734) | 71% (894/1259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (251/502) | 51% (457/904) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (68/136) | 35% (76/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (519/1216) | 38% (845/2247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (5/2) | 45% (10/12) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 50% (15/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 18% (17/3) |
Jacopo Berrettini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Alexis Galarneau
58%
(
68 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
31%
(
15 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Michael Vrbensky
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Sandro Kopp
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Berrettini Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
