James Marsalek vs Tomislav Podvinski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marsalek vs Podvinski analysis and find out who is favored!
James Marsalek vs Tomislav Podvinski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marsalek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Podvinski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marsalek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Podvinski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marsalek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Podvinski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marsalek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Podvinski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marsalek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 117/ 103), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 38). Podvinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 27/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marsalek winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Marsalek winning 2 and Podvinski winning 1. The last match between Marsalek and Podvinski was at the Serbia F1, 18-07-2016, Q1 round, Clay with James Marsalek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marsalek and Podvinski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Marsalek winning 1 times and Podvinski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marsalek winning 0, and Podvinski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marsalek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Podvinski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marsalek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Podvinski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marsalek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Podvinski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marsalek 1 - 0 Podvinski
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (198-201)
Career Total W/L
48% (30-33)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,575
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | James Marsalek | Tomislav Podvinski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-4 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | James Marsalek | Tomislav Podvinski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
SF |
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Tomislav Podvinski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Niklas Rohrer
Player
Tomislav Podvinski
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lukas Palovic
Player
Tomislav Podvinski
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Tomislav Podvinski
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H |
view more