Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Murray Kubler vs Riccardo Bonadio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kubler vs Bonadio analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Murray Kubler vs Riccardo Bonadio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kubler has won 46.15% of points on his second serve, while Bonadio has won 51.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kubler, in recent form, has won 53.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bonadio has won 49.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.58% and 28.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kubler has saved 53.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bonadio has saved 57.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kubler has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 12/ 11), with Bonadio winning 37.78% (W/L 17/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Bonadio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 367/ 275), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kubler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 7/ 1), where as Bonadio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 15/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kubler winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kubler winning 2 and Bonadio winning 1. The last match between Kubler and Bonadio was at the French Open - Paris, 16-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kubler and Bonadio have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kubler winning 1 times and Bonadio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kubler winning 0, and Bonadio 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kubler has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.74 while Bonadio has played against players with an average rank of 287.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kubler has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bonadio has won 15% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kubler has converted 32.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bonadio has converted 40.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kubler 1 - 0 Bonadio
190
Rank
63
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
360
Rank
164
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
67% (407-204)
Career Total W/L
57% (439-334)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$1,200,795
Career Prize Money
$158,415
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Riccardo Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (53/83) | 58% (48/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (40/53) | 71% (34/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (16/30) | 51% (18/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (31/83) | 33% (27/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Riccardo Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 42% (11/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (42/49) | 48% (122/134) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:55:34 | 1:44:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 48 | 227.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (193/297) | 62% (505/810) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (122/193) | 65% (327/505) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (48/104) | 52% (158/305) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (12/37) | 41% (29/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (123/318) | 37% (301/805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
68%
(
137 of
202)
1st Serve %
62%
(
109 of
175)
16
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
90 of
137)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
71 of
109)
43%
(
28 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
84 of
202)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
71 of
175)
189
Total Points Won
188
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hugo Gaston
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
67%
(
92 of
137)
1st Serve %
55%
(
77 of
140)
30
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
11
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
40 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
148
Total Points Won
129
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Ugo Humbert
66%
(
104 of
157)
1st Serve %
57%
(
77 of
135)
10
Aces
24
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
62 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
135)
147
Total Points Won
145
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Riccardo Bonadio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kubler Vs Bonadio Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
