Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cosano vs Tiffon analysis and find out who is favored!
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cosano has won 53.72% of points on his second serve, while Tiffon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cosano, in recent form, has won 53.77% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tiffon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cosano has saved 61.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiffon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cosano has won 65% of matches played (W/L 52/ 28), with Tiffon winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 297/ 177), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Tiffon has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.41% of matches (W/L 31/ 23), where as Tiffon has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cosano has played against opponents with an average rank of 332.68 while Tiffon has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cosano has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiffon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cosano has converted 45.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiffon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cosano 0 - 0 Tiffon
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Javier Barranco Cosano | Pol MARTIN Tiffon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (23/12) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (53/33) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (432/357) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (17/8) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 72 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 89 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 351.77 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1529/2449) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (978/1529) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (507/920) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (135/298) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1084/2491) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (16/11) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (8/16) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (25/20) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (25/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 1st Match |
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Felix Gill
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Hugo Grenier
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pol MARTIN Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
13
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cosano Vs Tiffon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
