Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joao Lucas REIS DA Silva vs Otto Virtanen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silva vs Virtanen analysis and find out who is favored!
Joao Lucas REIS DA Silva vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silva has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Virtanen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silva, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silva has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Virtanen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silva has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Virtanen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of while Virtanen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silva has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Virtanen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silva has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Virtanen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Silva 0 - 0 Virtanen
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Joao Lucas REIS DA Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Otto Virtanen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Silva Vs Virtanen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
