Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joshua Sheehy vs Pietro Orlando Fellin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sheehy vs Fellin analysis and find out who is favored!
Joshua Sheehy vs Pietro Orlando Fellin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sheehy has won 51.66% of points on his second serve, while Fellin has won 53.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sheehy, in recent form, has won 49.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fellin has won 55.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.12% and 38.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sheehy has saved 65.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fellin has saved 61.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sheehy has won 43.48% of matches played (W/L 20/ 26), with Fellin winning 68.18% (W/L 30/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sheehy has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Fellin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 37/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Sheehy has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17), where as Fellin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sheehy has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.76 while Fellin has played against players with an average rank of 137.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sheehy has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fellin has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sheehy has converted 47.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fellin has converted 45.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sheehy 0 - 0 Fellin
803
Rank
678
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
51% (90-87)
Career Total W/L
58% (57-42)
50% (9-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joshua Sheehy | Pietro Orlando Fellin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (183/197) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 249 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (763/1258) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (498/763) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (263/495) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (42/93) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (444/1197) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Joshua Sheehy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Joshua Sheehy
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Abel Forger
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kris Van Wyk
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Trochu
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Joshua Sheehy
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Lasse Poertner
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Yousef Khamis
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pietro Orlando Fellin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Giles Hussey
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Luciano Barbarino
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Bader Alabdullah
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Ali Habib
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Leyton Rivera
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Jasel Beltre
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
51%
(
18 of
35)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sheehy Vs Fellin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
