Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juncheng Shang vs Colin Markes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Markes analysis and find out who is favored!
Juncheng Shang vs Colin Markes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 53.45% of points on his second serve, while Markes has won 53.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 49.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Markes has won 56.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.09% and 26.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Markes has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 60.32% of matches played (W/L 38/ 25), with Markes winning 41.67% (W/L 15/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 35/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Markes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 108/ 74), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Markes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shang winning 2 and Markes winning 0. The last match between Shang and Markes was at the Granby Challenger, 25-08-2022, Second, Hard with Juncheng Shang getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shang and Markes have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shang winning 0 times and Markes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shang winning 0, and Markes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.59 while Markes has played against players with an average rank of 246.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Markes has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 32.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Markes has converted 34.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shang 1 - 0 Markes
105
Rank
105
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
814
Rank
582
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
62% (101-61)
Career Total W/L
56% (132-103)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$730,415
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Colin Markes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:59 | 1:3:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (20/37) | 54% (27/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 90% (18/20) | 67% (18/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 82% (14/17) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (23/50) | 14% (5/37) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Juncheng Shang
Player
Colin Markes
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Colin Markes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (33/28) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (304/294) | 29% (5/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.88 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:24 | 1:14:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 137.04 | 666 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1212/1942) | 53% (31/59) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (823/1212) | 61% (19/31) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (396/730) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (66/201) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (743/1956) | 33% (18/55) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (1/0) |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
62 of
120)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Corentin Moutet
71%
(
97 of
136)
1st Serve %
64%
(
98 of
154)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
62 of
98)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
48 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
62 of
154)
150
Total Points Won
140
|
6-7(9) 6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Juncheng Shang
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Juncheng Shang
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Colin Markes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Colin Markes
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
Player
Colin Markes
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Echeverria
Player
Colin Markes
56%
(
65 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
110)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Colin Markes
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
8
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Nicaise Muamba
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Kuang Qing Xu
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Colin Markes
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Mark Whitehouse
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Tiago Torres
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
35%
(
23 of
65)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Shang Vs Markes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juncheng Shang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
