Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kacper Zuk vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zuk vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Kacper Zuk vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zuk has won 53.79% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zuk, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.25% and 29.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zuk has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 58.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zuk has won 42.42% of matches played (W/L 14/ 19), with Fanselow winning 61.63% (W/L 53/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 87/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Zuk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zuk winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zuk winning 2 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Zuk and Fanselow was at the M25 Vale Do Lobo, 28-10-2020, First, Hard with Kacper Zuk getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zuk and Fanselow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zuk winning 0 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zuk winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zuk has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.18 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 228.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zuk has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zuk has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 34.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zuk 1 - 0 Fanselow
631
Rank
162
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (226-155)
Career Total W/L
61% (353-230)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$75,150
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kacper Zuk | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) | 65% (55/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (32/38) | 65% (36/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 38% (11/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (37/84) | 27% (16/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Kacper Zuk
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kacper Zuk | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 49% (34/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (48/55) | 50% (346/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 141 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:2 | 1:48:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 263.5 | 225.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (222/318) | 58% (1259/2163) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (146/222) | 71% (894/1259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (55/96) | 51% (457/904) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (8/21) | 35% (76/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 30% (87/292) | 38% (845/2247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 45% (10/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 50% (15/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 18% (17/3) |
Kacper Zuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Kacper Zuk
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Kacper Zuk
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
16
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Viktor Frydrych
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Kacper Zuk
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Kacper Zuk
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Kacper Zuk
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Kacper Zuk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
97%
(
38 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Jiri Vesely
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
10
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Petr Nouza
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zuk Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
