Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kamil Majchrzak vs Noah Rubin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Majchrzak vs Rubin analysis and find out who is favored!
Kamil Majchrzak vs Noah Rubin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 1 - 0 Rubin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Majchrzak has won 59.85% of points on his second serve, while Rubin has won 53.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Majchrzak, in recent form, has won 55.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rubin has won 51.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.73% and 34.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Majchrzak has saved 69.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rubin has saved 56.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Majchrzak has won 82.5% of matches played (W/L 33/ 7), with Rubin winning 54.55% (W/L 6/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 216/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29). Rubin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 92).
- Player level: In the last year, Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Rubin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Majchrzak winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 2 and Rubin winning 0. The last match between Majchrzak and Rubin was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 10-01-2019, Q2 round, Hard with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Majchrzak and Rubin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Majchrzak winning 0 times and Rubin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Majchrzak winning 0, and Rubin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Majchrzak has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.7 while Rubin has played against players with an average rank of 208.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Majchrzak has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rubin has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Majchrzak has converted 47.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rubin has converted 46.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 1 - 0 Rubin
357
Rank
75
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
734
Rank
125
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
64% (366-209)
Career Total W/L
56% (215-169)
83% (33-7)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$867,345
Career Prize Money
$398,175
4
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Noah Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (40/65) | 66% (33/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (31/40) | 58% (19/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (24/50) | 31% (20/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Noah Rubin
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Noah Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 83% (33/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 79% (68/18) | 58% (15/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 65% (483/257) | 54% (131/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (16/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 88% (15/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 151 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:43 | 1:42:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.7 | 208.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1283/2065) | 65% (509/779) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (973/1283) | 65% (333/509) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 60% (468/782) | 54% (145/270) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (132/279) | 46% (39/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1001/2227) | 41% (294/715) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (11/4) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (21/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 85% (33/39) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (33/32) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (33/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
5
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Robin Bertrand
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Michal Krajci
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Noah Rubin
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Vadym Ursu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Majchrzak Vs Rubin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
