Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kiranpal Pannu vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pannu vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Kiranpal Pannu vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pannu 0 - 1 Krueger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pannu has won 42.53% of points on his second serve, while Krueger has won 52.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pannu, in recent form, has won 51.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.41% and 30.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pannu has saved 51.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 57.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pannu has won 56% of matches played (W/L 28/ 22), with Krueger winning 53.85% (W/L 35/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pannu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 69/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Pannu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pannu winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pannu winning 0 and Krueger winning 2. The last match between Pannu and Krueger was at the M25 Naples, 17-02-2021, First, Clay with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pannu and Krueger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pannu winning 0 times and Krueger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pannu winning 0, and Krueger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pannu has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.24 while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 265.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pannu has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pannu has converted 53.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 41.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pannu 0 - 1 Krueger
645
Rank
574
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
252
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
57% (109-81)
Career Total W/L
53% (400-358)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
59% (20-14)
$14,725
Career Prize Money
$697,038
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kiranpal Pannu | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (30/56) | 74% (28/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 79% (22/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 70% (7/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (9/38) | 59% (33/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kiranpal Pannu | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 59% (20/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 59% (47/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (241/241) | 52% (429/399) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 143 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:53 | 1:58:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.96 | 322.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (963/1553) | 66% (1706/2604) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (624/963) | 69% (1174/1706) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (249/590) | 52% (469/898) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (76/141) | 42% (102/244) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (617/1466) | 40% (1099/2765) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 63% (19/11) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 59% (20/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 65% (15/23) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (15/5) | 14% (14/2) |
Kiranpal Pannu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Daniel Vishnick
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
47 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Benjamin Lock
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Peter Bertran
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Collin Altamirano
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
30
Total Points Won
34
|
3-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Nahuel Fernandez
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Pannu Vs Krueger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
