Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kristjan Tamm vs Simone Cacciapuoti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tamm vs Cacciapuoti analysis and find out who is favored!
Kristjan Tamm vs Simone Cacciapuoti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamm has won 45.28% of points on his second serve, while Cacciapuoti has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamm, in recent form, has won 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cacciapuoti has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tamm has saved 66.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cacciapuoti has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tamm has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 12/ 14), with Cacciapuoti winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 94/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19). Cacciapuoti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 24/ 39), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Tamm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Cacciapuoti has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tamm winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tamm winning 2 and Cacciapuoti winning 0. The last match between Tamm and Cacciapuoti was at the M15 Tabarka, 24-04-2019, First, Clay with Kristjan Tamm getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tamm and Cacciapuoti have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tamm winning 0 times and Cacciapuoti 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tamm winning 0, and Cacciapuoti 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamm has played against opponents with an average rank of 145.15 while Cacciapuoti has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamm has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cacciapuoti has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamm has converted 39.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cacciapuoti has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tamm 1 - 0 Cacciapuoti
827
Rank
625
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
51% (164-155)
Career Total W/L
37% (26-44)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tamm VS Cacciapuoti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Kristjan Tamm | Simone Cacciapuoti |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (28/54) | 77% (54/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 52% (28/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 25% (4/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (38/70) | 39% (21/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tamm VS Cacciapuoti H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Simone Cacciapuoti
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kristjan Tamm | Simone Cacciapuoti |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (187/193) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 99 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 194.53 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (790/1267) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (550/790) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (216/477) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (42/107) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (448/1198) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Kristjan Tamm
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Ye Hongyu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Kristjan Tamm
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Illya Beloborodko
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Simone Cacciapuoti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 0-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patric Prinoth
Player
Simone Cacciapuoti
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolo Pozzani
Player
Simone Cacciapuoti
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Tamm Vs Cacciapuoti Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
