Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kuzey Cekirge vs Stefanos Sakellaridis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cekirge vs Sakellaridis analysis and find out who is favored!
Kuzey Cekirge vs Stefanos Sakellaridis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cekirge has won 47.83% of points on his second serve, while Sakellaridis has won 50.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cekirge, in recent form, has won 50.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sakellaridis has won 49.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.88% and 33.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cekirge has saved 51.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sakellaridis has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cekirge has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 46/ 24), with Sakellaridis winning 55.45% (W/L 61/ 49) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cekirge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 129/ 82), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 63/ 47). Sakellaridis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 112/ 124).
- Player level: In the last year, Cekirge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 46/ 24), where as Sakellaridis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 48/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cekirge winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cekirge winning 3 and Sakellaridis winning 2. The last match between Cekirge and Sakellaridis was at the M25 La Nucia, 01-06-2023, First, Clay with Stefanos Sakellaridis getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cekirge and Sakellaridis have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cekirge winning 0 times and Sakellaridis 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cekirge winning 1, and Sakellaridis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cekirge has played against opponents with an average rank of 105.46 while Sakellaridis has played against players with an average rank of 256.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cekirge has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sakellaridis has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cekirge has converted 45.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sakellaridis has converted 39.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cekirge 1 - 1 Sakellaridis
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
399
Rank
396
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (192-129)
Career Total W/L
51% (200-189)
72% (28-11)
YTD W/L
60% (24-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cekirge VS Sakellaridis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Stefanos Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (68/108) | 64% (69/108) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (38/68) | 59% (41/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (13/40) | 44% (17/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (5/17) | 64% (9/14) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (50/108) | 53% (57/108) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Cekirge VS Sakellaridis H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Stefanos Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (28/11) | 60% (24/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (61/32) | 58% (56/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (506/414) | 52% (488/451) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 59% (19/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 72% (18/7) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 287 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 98.51 | 251.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (848/1308) | 60% (1672/2781) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (526/848) | 72% (1208/1672) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (220/460) | 52% (577/1109) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (69/152) | 40% (108/273) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (567/1275) | 39% (1136/2885) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (28/11) | 72% (18/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 60% (24/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 53% (8/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 53% (9/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 47% (17/8) | 18% (17/3) |
Kuzey Cekirge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Vit Kalina
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Zekai Li
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Denis Constantin Spiridon
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Matthias Ujvary
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stefanos Sakellaridis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
77%
(
92 of
120)
1st Serve %
56%
(
67 of
120)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
43 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Ergi Kirkin
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gonzalo Villanueva
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Ignacio Carou
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cekirge Vs Sakellaridis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
