Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Leo Borg vs Max Hans Rehberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Borg vs Rehberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Leo Borg vs Max Hans Rehberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Borg has won 42.47% of points on his second serve, while Rehberg has won 52.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Borg, in recent form, has won 51.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rehberg has won 51.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.77% and 30.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Borg has saved 51.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rehberg has saved 59.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Borg has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Rehberg winning 57.89% (W/L 33/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Borg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 37/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 3/ 14). Rehberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Borg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14), where as Rehberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Borg has played against opponents with an average rank of 174 while Rehberg has played against players with an average rank of 167.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Borg has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rehberg has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Borg has converted 38.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rehberg has converted 41.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Borg 0 - 0 Rehberg
462
Rank
334
High
20
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
479
Rank
382
High
20
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
49% (79-82)
Career Total W/L
53% (75-66)
30% (3-7)
YTD W/L
68% (19-9)
$9,880
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Leo Borg | Max Hans Rehberg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 30% (3/7) | 68% (19/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (8/15) | 63% (41/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (90/125) | 53% (354/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:9 | 1:51:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282 | 126.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (474/721) | 66% (1359/2046) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (272/474) | 71% (963/1359) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (111/247) | 53% (361/687) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (30/74) | 42% (84/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (279/699) | 38% (813/2123) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 72% (13/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 30% (3/10) | 68% (19/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 56% (10/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 36% (14/5) |
Leo Borg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Maik Steiner
Player
Leo Borg
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Davide Ferrarolli
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Leo Borg
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Leo Borg
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alessandro Ingarao
Player
Leo Borg
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Noah Perfetti
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
80%
(
75 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
51%
(
59 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
2-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Leo Borg
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Leo Borg
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Leo Borg
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Hans Rehberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Sorger
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Julius Seifert
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Mikalai Haliak
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Borg Vs Rehberg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Max Hans Rehberg
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
