Leopold Zima vs Max Houkes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Houkes analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Max Houkes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.31% of points on his second serve, while Houkes has won 48.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Houkes has won 51.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.48% and 35.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 56.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Houkes has saved 57.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 55.1% of matches played (W/L 27/ 22), with Houkes winning 56.06% (W/L 37/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55). Houkes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 201/ 102), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Houkes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.89% of matches (W/L 23/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zima winning 0 and Houkes winning 2. The last match between Zima and Houkes was at the M15 Innsbruck, 20-07-2022, First, Clay with Max Houkes getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Houkes have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Houkes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Houkes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 142.53 while Houkes has played against players with an average rank of 244.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Houkes has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 46.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Houkes has converted 45.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 0 - 1 Houkes
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
366
Rank
273
High
23
Age
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
56% (155-123)
Career Total W/L
64% (215-119)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Max Houkes |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 3 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) | 44% (26/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (18/30) | 73% (19/26) |
2nd Serve Win% | 18% (4/22) | 52% (17/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 50% (5/10) |
Return Points W% | 39% (23/59) | 58% (30/52) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Max Houkes
Player
Leopold Zima
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Max Houkes |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 55% (11/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) | 54% (25/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (281/248) | 52% (228/214) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 55% (11/9) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Aces Total | 64 | 55 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.39 |
DFs Total | 23 | 84 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 133.35 | 242.4 |
1st Serve % | 69% (528/770) | 60% (846/1405) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (378/528) | 69% (580/846) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (104/242) | 49% (272/559) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 44% (59/133) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (251/727) | 41% (583/1422) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 55% (6/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 55% (11/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 67% (6/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 90% (10/9) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 10% (10/1) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Max Houkes Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Max Houkes
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Samuele Pieri
Player
Max Houkes
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Max Houkes
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Houkes
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
47%
(
63 of
133)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
SF |
Valentin Royer
Player
Max Houkes
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Houkes
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Max Houkes
Player
Niccolo Catini
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Houkes
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Max Houkes
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Max Houkes
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more