Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liam Broady vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broady vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Broady vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broady has won 49.19% of points on his second serve, while Tu has won 52.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broady, in recent form, has won 51.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 51.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.75% and 31.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broady has saved 66.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broady has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 30/ 25), with Tu winning 55.56% (W/L 40/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 108/ 56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broady winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broady winning 2 and Tu winning 0. The last match between Broady and Tu was at the Chicago Challenger, 10-08-2022, First, Hard with Liam Broady getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broady and Tu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broady winning 0 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broady winning 0, and Tu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.78 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 227.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broady has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broady has converted 40.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 36.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Tu
145
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
194
Rank
186
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
58% (470-343)
Career Total W/L
63% (159-93)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$1,004,050
Career Prize Money
$98,510
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Liam Broady | Li Tu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:16 | 1:9:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (28/52) | 59% (27/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (23/28) | 67% (18/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (16/24) | 53% (10/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (18/46) | 25% (13/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Li Tu
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liam Broady | Li Tu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 59% (29/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (101/93) | 54% (262/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 59% (13/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 32 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:24 | 1:33:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.9 | 247.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (373/619) | 65% (912/1404) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (263/373) | 72% (657/912) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (121/246) | 53% (259/492) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (27/66) | 38% (53/140) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (249/626) | 39% (560/1454) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 90% (9/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 36% (4/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Andre Ilagan
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Makoto Ochi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
12
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Broady Vs Tu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
