Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louis Tessa vs Sem Verbeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tessa vs Verbeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Louis Tessa vs Sem Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tessa has won 50.37% of points on his second serve, while Verbeek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tessa, in recent form, has won 53.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tessa has saved 54.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbeek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tessa has won 68.83% of matches played (W/L 53/ 24), with Verbeek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tessa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 95/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Tessa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.74% of matches (W/L 53/ 23), where as Verbeek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tessa winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tessa winning 2 and Verbeek winning 1. The last match between Tessa and Verbeek was at the Tunisia F16 (Jerba), 26-04-2018, Second, Hard with Louis Tessa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tessa and Verbeek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tessa winning 1 times and Verbeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tessa winning 0, and Verbeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tessa has played against opponents with an average rank of 86.06 while Verbeek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tessa has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbeek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tessa has converted 40.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbeek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tessa 1 - 0 Verbeek
864
Rank
759
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
531
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (193-154)
Career Total W/L
57% (104-78)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louis Tessa | Sem Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:57:0 | 2:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (56/86) | 56% (58/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (27/56) | 60% (35/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (20/30) | 35% (16/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (53/104) | 45% (39/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Louis Tessa
Player
Sem Verbeek
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
11
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louis Tessa | Sem Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (201/166) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 129.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (737/1045) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (474/737) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (151/308) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (49/129) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (473/1100) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Louis Tessa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Louis Tessa
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve %
90%
(
26 of
29)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Denys Klok
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Jasza Szajrych
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Louis Tessa
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Marlon Vankan
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Toprak Avcibasi
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
80 of
104)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Louis Tessa
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Louis Tessa
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tessa Vs Verbeek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
