Luke Oakley vs Arvid Nordquist Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oakley vs Nordquist analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Oakley vs Arvid Nordquist Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oakley has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nordquist has won 50.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oakley, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nordquist has won 50.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oakley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nordquist has saved 58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oakley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nordquist winning 41.94% (W/L 13/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oakley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 13/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16). Nordquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Oakley winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Oakley winning 2 and Nordquist winning 0. The last match between Oakley and Nordquist was at the Greece F1 (Heraklion), 06-03-2017, Q1 round, Hard with Luke Oakley getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Oakley and Nordquist have played a deciding set 0 times, with Oakley winning 0 times and Nordquist 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Oakley winning 1, and Nordquist 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oakley has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nordquist has played against players with an average rank of 202.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oakley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nordquist has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oakley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nordquist has converted 43.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Oakley 1 - 0 Nordquist
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
889
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (54-35)
Career Total W/L
50% (117-117)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Luke Oakley | Arvid Nordquist |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Luke Oakley | Arvid Nordquist |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (15/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (124/102) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
Aces Total | 0 | 9 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 0 | 16 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:14:10 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 141.73 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 74% (327/442) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (204/327) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (58/115) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (22/48) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (184/438) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Luke Oakley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Cameron Silverman
Player
Luke Oakley
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(7) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jonny O'Mara
Player
Luke Oakley
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Arvid Nordquist Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Facundo Bermejo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Miles Jones
Player
Arvid Nordquist
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
80%
(
85 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Arvid Nordquist
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Matthew Segura
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 3-4 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more