Mac Kiger vs Vinicius Ono Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kiger vs Ono analysis and find out who is favored!
Mac Kiger vs Vinicius Ono Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kiger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ono has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kiger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ono has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kiger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ono has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kiger has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 3/ 5), with Ono winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kiger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 27/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8). Ono has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kiger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4), where as Ono has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kiger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kiger winning 2 and Ono winning 0. The last match between Kiger and Ono was at the USA F15 (Vero Beach), 24-04-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Mac Kiger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kiger and Ono have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kiger winning 0 times and Ono 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kiger winning 0, and Ono 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kiger has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.13 while Ono has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kiger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ono has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kiger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ono has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kiger 1 - 0 Ono
Mac Kiger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
Vinicius Ono
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (53-40)
Career Total W/L
41% (14-20)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mac Kiger | Vinicius Ono |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mac Kiger | Vinicius Ono |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mac Kiger Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mac Kiger
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Mac Kiger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Mac Kiger
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Garrett Johns
Player
Mac Kiger
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mac Kiger
Player
Jonathan Sorbo
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Peter Bertran
Player
Mac Kiger
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mac Kiger
Player
Jake Krug
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Mac Kiger
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
13
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Vinicius Ono Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Fernando Yamacita
Player
Vinicius Ono
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vinicius Ono
Player
Joao Marcos Nusdeo
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Fernando Romboli
Player
Vinicius Ono
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more