Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mark Lajal vs Adrian Bodmer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lajal vs Bodmer analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Lajal vs Adrian Bodmer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lajal 1 - 0 Bodmer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lajal has won 48.27% of points on his second serve, while Bodmer has won 62.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lajal, in recent form, has won 52.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bodmer has won 59.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.04% and 37.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lajal has saved 60.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bodmer has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lajal has won 51.56% of matches played (W/L 33/ 31), with Bodmer winning 85.71% (W/L 12/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lajal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 73/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 7/ 12). Bodmer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 110/ 52), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Lajal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/ 27), where as Bodmer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lajal winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lajal winning 2 and Bodmer winning 0. The last match between Lajal and Bodmer was at the M15 Bern, 29-06-2022, First, Clay with Mark Lajal getting the victory 6-1 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lajal and Bodmer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lajal winning 0 times and Bodmer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lajal winning 1, and Bodmer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lajal has played against opponents with an average rank of 349.22 while Bodmer has played against players with an average rank of 64.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lajal has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bodmer has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lajal has converted 34.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bodmer has converted 61.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lajal 1 - 0 Bodmer
203
Rank
191
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
644
Rank
455
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
60% (107-72)
Career Total W/L
60% (211-140)
45% (10-12)
YTD W/L
100% (7-0)
$11,825
Career Prize Money
$2,195
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mark Lajal | Adrian Bodmer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) | 57% (32/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (35/45) | 78% (25/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 46% (11/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (20/56) | 28% (18/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Mark Lajal
Player
Adrian Bodmer
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mark Lajal | Adrian Bodmer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (10/12) | 100% (7/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (26/27) | 88% (14/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/253) | 67% (94/46) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 100% (7/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 104 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.03 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:54 | 1:10:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 351.41 | 78 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (892/1528) | 67% (211/313) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (635/892) | 66% (139/211) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (307/636) | 67% (68/102) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (53/153) | 61% (25/41) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (579/1528) | 48% (167/350) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (9/21) | 100% (7/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Mark Lajal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Mark Lajal
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
9
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
8
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jie Cui
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
16
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Mark Lajal
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Denis Yevseyev
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mark Lajal
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Duckhee Lee
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Bodmer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
52%
(
46 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Evangelos Kypriotis
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Lajal Vs Bodmer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
