Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mattias Siimar vs Siim Troost Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siimar vs Troost analysis and find out who is favored!
Mattias Siimar vs Siim Troost Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siimar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Troost has won 48.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siimar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Troost has won 45.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siimar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Troost has saved 64.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siimar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Troost winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siimar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 24/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Troost has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Siimar winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Siimar winning 4 and Troost winning 1. The last match between Siimar and Troost was at the Finland F2 (Hyvinkaa), 06-08-2018, First, Clay with Mattias Siimar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:50:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siimar and Troost have played a deciding set 1 times, with Siimar winning 1 times and Troost 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Siimar winning 0, and Troost 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siimar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Troost has played against players with an average rank of 43.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siimar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Troost has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siimar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Troost has converted 45.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Siimar 2 - 0 Troost
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
55% (35-29)
Career Total W/L
41% (35-50)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mattias Siimar | Siim Troost |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:50:30 | 0:50:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (36/70) | 49% (34/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (24/36) | 62% (21/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 39% (14/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (35/70) | 37% (26/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Mattias Siimar
Player
Siim Troost
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mattias Siimar | Siim Troost |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (46/51) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 74.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (111/193) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (67/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (33/82) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 27% (4/15) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (70/199) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Mattias Siimar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Mattias Siimar
48%
(
42 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Kenneth Raisma
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Benjamin Lock
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Vilius Gaubas
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Mattias Siimar
15%
(
2 of
13)
1st Serve %
75%
(
6 of
8)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
20
Total Points Won
1
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Simon Freund
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Siim Troost Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Siim Troost
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
Player
Siim Troost
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Siim Troost
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Gautier
Player
Siim Troost
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Siim Troost
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Siim Troost
Player
Mikhail Malakhovich
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Agafonov
Player
Siim Troost
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Siim Troost
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
29 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Siimar Vs Troost Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
