Michael Mmoh vs Christopher O\'Connell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs O\'Connell analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Christopher O\'Connell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 47.18% of points on his second serve, while O\'Connell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 48.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while O\'Connell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 59.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas O\'Connell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 53.45% of matches played (W/L 31/ 27), with O\'Connell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). O\'Connell has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as O\'Connell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.31 while O\'Connell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while O\'Connell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 42.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and O\'Connell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mmoh 0 - 0 O\'Connell
Michael Mmoh
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
Christopher O\'Connell
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mmoh VS O\'Connell H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michael Mmoh | Christopher O\'Connell |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (20/24) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (204/209) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.53 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 107 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.31 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 62 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:48 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 172.75 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 65% (856/1312) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 71% (607/856) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (211/456) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (47/107) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 37% (473/1287) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 1st Match |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Aidan Mayo
Player
Michael Mmoh
43%
(
34 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Christopher O\'Connell Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available