Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kukushkin vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kukushkin has won 54.92% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kukushkin, in recent form, has won 56.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 53.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.7% and 36.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kukushkin has saved 64.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 62.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kukushkin has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 45/ 25), with Jubb winning 70% (W/L 49/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kukushkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 237/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 23/ 33). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Kukushkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 40/ 18), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.17% of matches (W/L 30/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kukushkin winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kukushkin winning 0 and Jubb winning 2. The last match between Kukushkin and Jubb was at the Surbiton Challenger, 01-06-2022, First, Grass with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kukushkin and Jubb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kukushkin winning 0 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kukushkin winning 0, and Jubb 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kukushkin has played against opponents with an average rank of 312.61 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 299.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kukushkin has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kukushkin has converted 43.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 44.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kukushkin 0 - 1 Jubb
134
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
332
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
57% (605-461)
Career Total W/L
70% (196-84)
69% (27-12)
YTD W/L
70% (26-11)
$3,702,670
Career Prize Money
$54,540
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mikhail Kukushkin | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:54 | 1:38:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (57/82) | 62% (44/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (35/57) | 80% (35/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 52% (14/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (22/71) | 40% (33/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(9) |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mikhail Kukushkin | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (27/12) | 70% (26/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (58/29) | 65% (58/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (451/376) | 56% (484/387) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (14/3) | 77% (17/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 151 |
| DFs per game | 0.05 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:29 | 1:50:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 301.85 | 291.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1778/2582) | 63% (1695/2693) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1213/1778) | 72% (1217/1695) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (449/804) | 54% (535/998) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (115/264) | 41% (126/304) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1088/2694) | 42% (1205/2875) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (26/8) | 66% (19/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (25/37) | 69% (25/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 69% (11/16) | 73% (8/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 56% (9/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 87% (23/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 13% (23/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 43% (14/6) |
Mikhail Kukushkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Cristian Garin
69%
(
94 of
136)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
1
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
53 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
5-7 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
72 of
109)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
55%
(
6 of
11)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Mathias Bourgue
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
60%
(
86 of
143)
1st Serve %
71%
(
74 of
104)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
60 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
124
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Enzo Wallart
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Blake Mott
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
78 of
96)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Filip Peliwo
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Knaff
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kukushkin Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
