Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mikolaj Lorens vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lorens vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Mikolaj Lorens vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lorens 1 - 0 Visker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lorens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Visker has won 51.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lorens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 47.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lorens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 67.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lorens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Visker winning 62.34% (W/L 48/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lorens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 66/ 44).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lorens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lorens winning 2 and Visker winning 0. The last match between Lorens and Visker was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 17-03-2021, First, Hard with Mikolaj Lorens getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lorens and Visker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lorens winning 0 times and Visker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lorens winning 0, and Visker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lorens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 144.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lorens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lorens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 39.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lorens 1 - 0 Visker
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
592
Rank
592
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
44% (11-14)
Career Total W/L
63% (116-68)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mikolaj Lorens | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (36/69) | 75% (47/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (27/36) | 72% (34/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (21/33) | 44% (7/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (22/63) | 30% (21/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Mikolaj Lorens
Player
Niels Visker
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mikolaj Lorens | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (22/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (47/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (384/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 233 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:22:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 109.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1386/2182) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 74% (1027/1386) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (409/795) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (69/165) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (740/2058) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (22/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (21/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (24/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (24/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Mikolaj Lorens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikolaj Lorens
Player
Aldin Setkic
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikolaj Lorens
Player
Niels Visker
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeroen Vanneste
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timur Khabibulin
Player
Mikolaj Lorens
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Niels Visker
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Niels Visker
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lorens Vs Visker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
