Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Harry Bourchier Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Bourchier analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Harry Bourchier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.88% of points on his second serve, while Bourchier has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bourchier has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bourchier has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 36/ 32), with Bourchier winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 191), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bourchier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 30/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 23/ 23), where as Bourchier has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Bourchier winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Bourchier was at the Zadar Challenger, 23-03-2021, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Bourchier have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Bourchier 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Bourchier 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.18 while Bourchier has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bourchier has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bourchier has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Bourchier
207
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
848
Rank
279
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
57% (339-254)
Career Total W/L
54% (185-155)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$6,370
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Harry Bourchier |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:40 | 1:19:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (36/49) | 73% (49/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (26/36) | 55% (27/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (7/13) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (34/67) | 33% (16/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Harry Bourchier
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Harry Bourchier |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (16/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (174/207) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 320.59 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (688/1095) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (475/688) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (196/407) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (29/84) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (409/1142) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Harry Bourchier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Harry Bourchier
46%
(
43 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
9
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Harry Bourchier
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
10 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Harry Bourchier
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Harry Bourchier
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
40
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Harry Bourchier
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Harry Bourchier
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Bega
Player
Harry Bourchier
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Harry Bourchier
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Harry Bourchier
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
10
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Bourchier Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
