Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Mattia Bellucci Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Bellucci analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Mattia Bellucci Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.88% of points on his second serve, while Bellucci has won 50.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bellucci has won 49.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.84% and 27.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bellucci has saved 59.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 36/ 33), with Bellucci winning 50% (W/L 35/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 191), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bellucci has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 106/ 52), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 26/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 24), where as Bellucci has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.79% of matches (W/L 32/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Bellucci winning 2. The last match between Fatic and Bellucci was at the Vilnus Challenger, 20-10-2022, Second, I.hard with Mattia Bellucci getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Bellucci have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Bellucci 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Bellucci 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.61 while Bellucci has played against players with an average rank of 313.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bellucci has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bellucci has converted 38.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Bellucci
207
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
176
Rank
142
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (339-254)
Career Total W/L
62% (192-116)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
38% (9-15)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$171,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Mattia Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:41 | 1:43:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (91/138) | 67% (92/137) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (65/91) | 71% (65/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (26/47) | 62% (28/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (44/137) | 34% (47/138) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Nerman Fatic
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mattia Bellucci
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Mattia Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 38% (9/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (16/24) | 44% (24/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (174/207) | 48% (260/277) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 149 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:53 | 1:41:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 320.59 | 361.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (688/1095) | 61% (994/1639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (475/688) | 72% (716/994) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (196/407) | 51% (327/645) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (29/84) | 39% (51/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (409/1142) | 35% (588/1669) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 27% (3/8) | 36% (8/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 60% (15/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 40% (15/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (9/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Mattia Bellucci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Mattia Bellucci
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Mattia Bellucci
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Jules Marie
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Mattia Bellucci
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
0-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Mattia Bellucci
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mattia Bellucci
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Marko Topo
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Bellucci Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
