Nicholas Bybel vs Aidan Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bybel vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicholas Bybel vs Aidan Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bybel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kim has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bybel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 53.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bybel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 61.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bybel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kim winning 57.14% (W/L 8/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bybel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 72/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bybel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bybel winning 2 and Kim winning 0. The last match between Bybel and Kim was at the M15 Sunrise, 11-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Nicholas Bybel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bybel and Kim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bybel winning 0 times and Kim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bybel winning 0, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bybel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kim has played against players with an average rank of 209.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bybel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bybel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bybel 1 - 0 Kim
Nicholas Bybel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
852
Rank
700
High
19
Age
Plays
Aidan Kim
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
52% (127-117)
Career Total W/L
47% (26-29)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nicholas Bybel | Aidan Kim |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nicholas Bybel | Aidan Kim |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (21/22) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.62 |
Aces Total | 0 | 13 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.52 |
DFs Total | 0 | 11 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:30 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (97/150) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (61/97) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (24/53) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (7/21) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (62/146) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicholas Bybel Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nicholas Bybel
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
Oliver Crawford
Player
Nicholas Bybel
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Piotr Kusiewicz
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Sergo Sikharulidze
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matias Zukas
Player
Nicholas Bybel
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Aidan Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Axel Nefve
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
6
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Aidan Kim
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Semen Pankin
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Preston Brown
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
32%
(
17 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Aidan Kim
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Daniel Little
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Evan Zhu
Player
Aidan Kim
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Dmitry Popko
Player
Aidan Kim
41%
(
24 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more