Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolas Kicker vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kicker vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolas Kicker vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kicker has won 55.31% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kicker, in recent form, has won 49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 48.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.92% and 30.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kicker has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kicker has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 5/ 7), with Zandschulp winning 47.17% (W/L 25/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kicker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 316/ 213), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Kicker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 4/ 1), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kicker winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kicker winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Kicker and Zandschulp was at the Tampere Challenger, 24-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kicker and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kicker winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kicker winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kicker has played against opponents with an average rank of 335.83 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 171.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kicker has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kicker has converted 37.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kicker 1 - 0 Zandschulp
690
Rank
78
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
112
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
59% (348-244)
Career Total W/L
63% (331-195)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
44% (11-14)
$521,720
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kicker VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nicolas Kicker | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:16:46 | 2:16:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (56/78) | 58% (49/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (30/56) | 57% (28/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 100% (4/4) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (37/84) | 42% (33/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kicker VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolas Kicker | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 44% (11/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 43% (24/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 39% (36/56) | 48% (267/293) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 114 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:11 | 1:47:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 425.6 | 181.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (176/284) | 63% (1134/1792) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (100/176) | 69% (779/1134) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (57/108) | 49% (320/658) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (9/32) | 37% (56/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (121/324) | 37% (653/1753) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 48% (11/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 7% (14/1) |
Nicolas Kicker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nicolas Kicker
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Nicolas Kicker
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Nicolas Kicker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Gianluca Mager
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Nicolas Kicker
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Nicolas Kicker
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Gonzalo Villanueva
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Wilson Leite
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Matias Soto
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kicker Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
