Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Peter Bothwell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gonzalez vs Bothwell analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Peter Bothwell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gonzalez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bothwell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gonzalez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bothwell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gonzalez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bothwell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gonzalez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bothwell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 291/ 133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Bothwell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 16/ 20).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Gonzalez winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Gonzalez winning 5 and Bothwell winning 3. The last match between Gonzalez and Bothwell was at the Portugal F15 (Sintra), 14-08-2018, First, Hard with Pablo Vivero Gonzalez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gonzalez and Bothwell have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gonzalez winning 1 times and Bothwell 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gonzalez winning 0, and Bothwell 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gonzalez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bothwell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gonzalez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bothwell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gonzalez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bothwell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gonzalez 2 - 1 Bothwell
Ret.
Rank
283
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
602
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
65% (309-164)
Career Total W/L
52% (170-158)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Peter Bothwell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 20 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:20 | 1:40:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (130/210) | 59% (125/211) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (96/130) | 63% (79/125) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (34/80) | 43% (37/86) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (14/24) | 47% (9/19) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (95/211) | 38% (80/210) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Peter Bothwell
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
109
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-1 2-0 ret. |
Stats
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Peter Bothwell
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
0%
(
0 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
35
Total Points Won
15
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Peter Bothwell
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Peter Bothwell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reese Stalder
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Lluc Mir Anglada
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Bothwell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Ojeda Lara
Player
Peter Bothwell
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bothwell
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
59%
(
73 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
125)
127
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathieu Perchicot
Player
Peter Bothwell
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bothwell
Player
Albert Roglan
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Peter Bothwell
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Kijametovic
Player
Peter Bothwell
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Nejedly
Player
Peter Bothwell
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Peter Bothwell
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Peter Bothwell
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gonzalez Vs Bothwell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
