Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrik Niklas-Salminen vs Ryan Peniston Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niklas-Salminen vs Peniston analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrik Niklas-Salminen vs Ryan Peniston Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peniston has won 55.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niklas-Salminen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peniston has won 52.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niklas-Salminen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peniston has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peniston winning 50.98% (W/L 26/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niklas-Salminen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40). Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niklas-Salminen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Niklas-Salminen winning 2 and Peniston winning 0. The last match between Niklas-Salminen and Peniston was at the M25 Porto, 30-09-2020, First, Hard with Patrik Niklas-Salminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niklas-Salminen and Peniston have played a deciding set 0 times, with Niklas-Salminen winning 0 times and Peniston 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niklas-Salminen winning 0, and Peniston 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niklas-Salminen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peniston has played against players with an average rank of 242.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peniston has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niklas-Salminen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peniston has converted 36.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Niklas-Salminen 1 - 0 Peniston
881
Rank
418
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
215
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
53% (164-147)
Career Total W/L
61% (287-186)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$221,850
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Niklas-Salminen VS Peniston H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Patrik Niklas-Salminen | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (37/61) | 66% (35/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (32/37) | 66% (23/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (12/24) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (23/53) | 28% (17/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Niklas-Salminen VS Peniston H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrik Niklas-Salminen | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (8/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (84/92) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 230 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (297/516) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (207/297) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (120/219) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (17/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (228/607) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
10
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
65 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karol Drzewiecki
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksi Lofman
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Peetu Pohjola
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Oskari Eerola
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Blaydes
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
80)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niklas-Salminen Vs Peniston Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
