search

Pol SANCHEZ Vinas vs Kuzey Cekirge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vinas vs Cekirge analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Pol SANCHEZ Vinas vs Kuzey Cekirge Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vinas has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cekirge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vinas, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cekirge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Vinas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cekirge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Vinas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cekirge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vinas has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cekirge has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vinas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cekirge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Vinas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cekirge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Vinas 0 - 0 Cekirge

Pol SANCHEZ Vinas

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

22

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

24

Age

Plays

Kuzey Cekirge

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Form

W W L W W W W L W L

Career Total W/L

YTD W/L

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

YTD Titles

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Vinas VS Cekirge H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Pol SANCHEZ Vinas Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Pol Sanchez Vinas
60% ( 21 of 35)
1st Serve %
65% ( 34 of 52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
76% ( 16 of 21)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 15 of 34)
43% ( 6 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 13 of 35)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 33 of 52)
55
Total Points Won
32
L
6-3 4-0 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Pol Sanchez Vinas
Player
Baptiste Zambelli
55% ( 42 of 77)
1st Serve %
58% ( 53 of 91)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 35 of 53)
40% ( 14 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 17 of 38)
20% ( 2 of 10)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
40% ( 31 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 39 of 91)
85
Total Points Won
83
L
7-5 2-6 10-5 H2H
Q1
L
7-5 2-6 10-7 H2H
Q2
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
L
7-6(3) 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
0-6 6-1 10-2 H2H
Q2
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
L
6-3 6-0 H2H

Kuzey Cekirge Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R2
cross
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62% ( 28 of 45)
1st Serve %
63% ( 32 of 51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68% ( 19 of 28)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 13 of 32)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
33% ( 15 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 32 of 51)
62
Total Points Won
34
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66% ( 63 of 96)
1st Serve %
81% ( 73 of 90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52% ( 33 of 63)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 31 of 73)
45% ( 15 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 6 of 17)
56% ( 9 of 16)
Break Points Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
50% ( 48 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 53 of 90)
101
Total Points Won
85
W
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38% ( 23 of 60)
1st Serve %
65% ( 47 of 72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74% ( 17 of 23)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 28 of 47)
59% ( 22 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
35% ( 21 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
72
Total Points Won
60
L
6-2 1-6 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
61% ( 43 of 70)
1st Serve %
46% ( 28 of 61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72% ( 31 of 43)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 16 of 28)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 17 of 33)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 26 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 28 of 61)
72
Total Points Won
59
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Vit Kalina
70% ( 37 of 53)
1st Serve %
69% ( 45 of 65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59% ( 22 of 37)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 25 of 45)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 3 of 3)
40% ( 21 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 30 of 65)
62
Total Points Won
56
W
4-6 6-2 11-9 H2H
Q2
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Zekai Li
68% ( 48 of 71)
1st Serve %
67% ( 58 of 86)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 36 of 58)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
34% ( 24 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 38 of 86)
85
Total Points Won
72
W
5-7 7-5 10-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-4 7-6(0) H2H
QF
cross
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71% ( 32 of 45)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66% ( 21 of 32)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 15 of 37)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
36% ( 16 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 33 of 55)
62
Total Points Won
38
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Denis Constantin Spiridon
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve %
53% ( 33 of 62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72% ( 26 of 36)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 18 of 33)
69% ( 9 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 33 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
43
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Matthias Ujvary
62% ( 29 of 47)
1st Serve %
48% ( 21 of 44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
79% ( 23 of 29)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
32% ( 15 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
56
Total Points Won
35
W
6-2 6-1 H2H

Vinas Vs Cekirge Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions