Raphael Baltensperger vs MAIKEL Borg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baltensperger vs Borg analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphael Baltensperger vs MAIKEL Borg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baltensperger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Borg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baltensperger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Borg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baltensperger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Borg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baltensperger has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Borg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 46/ 48). Borg has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Borg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baltensperger has played against opponents with an average rank of 124 while Borg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baltensperger has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Borg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baltensperger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Borg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baltensperger 0 - 0 Borg
Raphael Baltensperger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
MAIKEL Borg
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Baltensperger VS Borg H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Raphael Baltensperger | MAIKEL Borg |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quentin Folliot
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
MAIKEL Borg Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Maikel Borg
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-0 ret. | H2H |
view more