Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roman Safiullin vs Kimmer Coppejans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Safiullin vs Coppejans analysis and find out who is favored!
Roman Safiullin vs Kimmer Coppejans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Safiullin 0 - 0 Coppejans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Safiullin has won 48.98% of points on his second serve, while Coppejans has won 48.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Safiullin, in recent form, has won 48.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coppejans has won 53.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.61% and 28.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Safiullin has saved 66.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coppejans has saved 64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Safiullin has won 53.7% of matches played (W/L 29/ 25), with Coppejans winning 51.43% (W/L 18/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Safiullin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 211/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 80/ 57). Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Safiullin has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12), where as Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Safiullin has played against opponents with an average rank of 103.87 while Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 236.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Safiullin has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coppejans has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Safiullin has converted 34.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coppejans has converted 22.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
40
Rank
36
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
270
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
66% (375-195)
Career Total W/L
57% (418-314)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$1,422,410
Career Prize Money
$294,830
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roman Safiullin | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (21/30) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (243/256) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 134 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:58 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 97.19 | 250.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (943/1629) | 61% (174/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (690/943) | 72% (125/174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (336/686) | 48% (54/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (47/138) | 23% (8/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (568/1598) | 36% (119/327) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 50% (4/2) |
Roman Safiullin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Corentin Moutet
Player
Roman Safiullin
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Roman Safiullin
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Roman Safiullin
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Roman Safiullin
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Roman Safiullin
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Safiullin Vs Coppejans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
