Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Kacper Zuk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Zuk analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Kacper Zuk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 48.96% of points on his second serve, while Zuk has won 54.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 54.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zuk has won 47.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.86% and 20.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 57.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zuk has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 63.44% of matches played (W/L 59/ 34), with Zuk winning 42.86% (W/L 15/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Zuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 87/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Zuk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Zuk winning 1. The last match between Nijboer and Zuk was at the Netherlands F6 (Haren), 29-08-2018, First, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Zuk have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nijboer winning 1 times and Zuk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Zuk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.31 while Zuk has played against players with an average rank of 237.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zuk has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zuk has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Zuk
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
634
Rank
162
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (217-166)
Career Total W/L
59% (226-155)
56% (15-12)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$75,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Kacper Zuk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:0 | 1:59:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) | 63% (59/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (33/41) | 66% (39/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (41/93) | 29% (20/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Kacper Zuk
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Kacper Zuk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (15/12) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (36/27) | 30% (3/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (322/274) | 47% (48/55) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 110 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 107 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:15 | 1:36:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.41 | 263.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1100/1855) | 70% (222/318) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (775/1100) | 66% (146/222) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (378/755) | 57% (55/96) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (95/217) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (802/1915) | 30% (87/292) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 33% (3/1) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kacper Zuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Kacper Zuk
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Kacper Zuk
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
16
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Viktor Frydrych
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Kacper Zuk
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Kacper Zuk
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Kacper Zuk
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Kacper Zuk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
97%
(
38 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Jiri Vesely
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
10
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Petr Nouza
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Zuk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
