Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sara Cakarevic vs Emily Appleton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cakarevic vs Appleton analysis and find out who is favored!
Sara Cakarevic vs Emily Appleton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cakarevic has won 45.53% of points on his second serve, while Appleton has won 47.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cakarevic, in recent form, has won 57.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Appleton has won 52.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.64% and 35.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cakarevic has saved 58.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Appleton has saved 53.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cakarevic has won 59.57% of matches played (W/L 28/ 19), with Appleton winning 53.85% (W/L 35/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cakarevic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 41/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 22/ 31). Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Cakarevic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19), where as Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 33/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cakarevic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cakarevic winning 2 and Appleton winning 0. The last match between Cakarevic and Appleton was at the W60 Rome, 16-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Sara Cakarevic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cakarevic and Appleton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cakarevic winning 0 times and Appleton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cakarevic winning 0, and Appleton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cakarevic has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.96 while Appleton has played against players with an average rank of 280.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cakarevic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Appleton has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cakarevic has converted 47.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Appleton has converted 39.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cakarevic 1 - 0 Appleton
459
Rank
304
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
394
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
58% (282-208)
Career Total W/L
50% (181-178)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
58% (18-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,804
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sara Cakarevic | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (32/51) | 46% (24/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 42% (10/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (30/52) | 35% (18/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Emily Appleton
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sara Cakarevic | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 58% (18/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (35/21) | 54% (37/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (286/225) | 51% (321/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (16/8) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.64 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 197 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.61 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 189 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:30 | 1:27:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.25 | 284.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1139/1732) | 57% (1140/1992) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (708/1139) | 71% (806/1140) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (274/593) | 47% (401/852) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (117/244) | 39% (92/237) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (807/1670) | 42% (887/2132) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (16/8) | 58% (18/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (16/23) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 19% (16/3) |
Sara Cakarevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Sara Cakarevic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Sara Cakarevic
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Diana Martynov
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
106)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Sara Cakarevic
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Ayda Altuntas
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
13
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Carson Branstine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Gergana Topalova
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Isabella Shinikova
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cakarevic Vs Appleton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
