Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Strong Kirchheimer vs Govind Nanda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Nanda analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Govind Nanda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.68% of points on his second serve, while Nanda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 44.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nanda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.12% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 62.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nanda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Nanda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115). Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 3 and Nanda winning 2. The last match between Kirchheimer and Nanda was at the Charleston Challenger, 26-09-2022, Q3, Hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Nanda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kirchheimer winning 0 times and Nanda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 0, and Nanda 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 291.5 while Nanda has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nanda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 39.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nanda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 1 Nanda
490
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (273-212)
Career Total W/L
58% (112-80)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$56,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Nanda H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:39:28 | 0:39:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (27/40) | 67% (36/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 39% (14/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (9/13) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (33/54) | 33% (13/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Kirchheimer VS Nanda H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Govind Nanda
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (17/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (161/182) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 491.93 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (678/1099) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (472/678) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (211/421) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (31/79) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (369/1057) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Sekou Bangoura
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirchheimer Vs Nanda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
