Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Max Wiskandt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Wiskandt analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Max Wiskandt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Wiskandt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 56.3% of points on his second serve, while Wiskandt has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wiskandt has won 55.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.61% and 38.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wiskandt has saved 58.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Wiskandt winning 62.65% (W/L 52/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 126), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Wiskandt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 71/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62% of matches (W/L 31/ 19), where as Wiskandt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 52/ 30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Wiskandt winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Wiskandt was at the Luedenscheid Challenger, 26-06-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-6(8).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Wiskandt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Wiskandt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 2, and Wiskandt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.43 while Wiskandt has played against players with an average rank of 162.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wiskandt has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wiskandt has converted 42.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
94
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
602
Rank
602
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
61% (317-206)
Career Total W/L
56% (103-82)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Max Wiskandt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:22 | 2:22:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (59/80) | 69% (63/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (40/59) | 62% (39/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (12/21) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (40/91) | 35% (28/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-6(8) |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Max Wiskandt
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Max Wiskandt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 62% (21/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (44/28) | 63% (49/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (372/313) | 57% (397/300) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 64% (21/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 83 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:46 | 1:46:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.57 | 171.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1546/2202) | 68% (1539/2260) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1033/1546) | 66% (1010/1539) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (366/656) | 50% (357/721) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (95/198) | 42% (128/304) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (858/2163) | 45% (1048/2319) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (21/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 64% (21/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 83% (24/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 17% (24/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 10% (10/1) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Wiskandt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Hamza Reguig
Player
Max Wiskandt
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Loann Massard
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve %
71%
(
22 of
31)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
7 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
43
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Enzo Wallart
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Leonardo Rossi
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Wiskandt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
