Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Terence Atmane vs James McCabe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs McCabe analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs James McCabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 48.65% of points on his second serve, while McCabe has won 51.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 46.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while McCabe has won 46.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.96% and 32.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 67.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCabe has saved 62.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 63.53% of matches played (W/L 54/ 31), with McCabe winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 86/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.21% of matches (W/L 33/ 14), where as McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atmane winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and McCabe winning 1. The last match between Atmane and McCabe was at the M15 Monastir, 25-11-2021, Second, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atmane and McCabe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Atmane winning 1 times and McCabe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atmane winning 0, and McCabe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.27 while McCabe has played against players with an average rank of 215.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCabe has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCabe has converted 40.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 McCabe
137
Rank
127
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
351
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
64% (183-105)
Career Total W/L
59% (104-73)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$332,325
Career Prize Money
$17,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Terence Atmane | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (61/102) | 66% (66/100) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (48/61) | 62% (41/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (21/41) | 53% (18/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (41/100) | 32% (33/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
James McCabe
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
7
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Terence Atmane | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 58% (19/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (41/34) | 54% (41/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (358/358) | 53% (388/346) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 56% (15/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.66 |
| Aces Total | 194 | 235 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 121 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:54 | 1:50:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.71 | 193.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1369/2329) | 59% (1371/2315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (986/1369) | 72% (983/1371) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (467/960) | 53% (498/944) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (75/175) | 41% (87/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (763/2142) | 37% (876/2343) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 65% (11/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 35% (6/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 94% (18/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 6% (18/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 13% (15/2) |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Christopher Eubanks
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Egor Gerasimov
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
32 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Federico Bondioli
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
James McCabe
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Rio Noguchi
43%
(
23 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Yi Zhou
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Atmane Vs McCabe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
