Terence Atmane vs Matheus Pucinelle De Almeida Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs Almeida analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs Matheus Pucinelle De Almeida Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 48.43% of points on his second serve, while Almeida has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 46.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Almeida has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 65.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Almeida has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 61.73% of matches played (W/L 50/ 31), with Almeida winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Almeida has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.21% of matches (W/L 33/ 14), where as Almeida has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.77 while Almeida has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Almeida has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 43.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Almeida has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atmane 0 - 0 Almeida
Terence Atmane
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
Matheus Pucinelle De Almeida
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Terence Atmane | Matheus Pucinelle De Almeida |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (33/33) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (310/323) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.58 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 180 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 109 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:22 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 176.41 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 58% (1202/2065) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 71% (858/1202) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (414/863) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (67/155) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 36% (679/1897) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 1st Match |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Zachary Svajda
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Sebastian Ofner
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Matheus Pucinelle De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available