Tommaso Carnevale-miino vs Clement Tabur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carnevale-miino vs Tabur analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommaso Carnevale-miino vs Clement Tabur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carnevale-miino has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tabur has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carnevale-miino, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tabur has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carnevale-miino has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tabur has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carnevale-miino has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tabur winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carnevale-miino has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tabur has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carnevale-miino has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tabur has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carnevale-miino has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tabur has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Carnevale-miino 0 - 0 Tabur
Tommaso Carnevale-miino
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
Clement Tabur
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carnevale-miino VS Tabur H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Tommaso Carnevale-miino Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marc Majdandzic
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adam Jurajda
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Schonenberg
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
Player
Florian Broska
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more