Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ugo Humbert vs Marc Polmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Humbert vs Polmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Ugo Humbert vs Marc Polmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Humbert has won 57.91% of points on his second serve, while Polmans has won 46.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Humbert, in recent form, has won 53.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Polmans has won 54.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.34% and 30.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Humbert has saved 67.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polmans has saved 59.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Humbert has won 68.49% of matches played (W/L 50/ 23), with Polmans winning 52.38% (W/L 33/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Humbert has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 137/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 47/ 48). Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 96/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Humbert has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 75.68% of matches (W/L 28/ 9), where as Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Humbert winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Humbert winning 3 and Polmans winning 3. The last match between Humbert and Polmans was at the French Open - Paris, 29-09-2020, First, Clay with Marc Polmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Humbert and Polmans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Humbert winning 0 times and Polmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Humbert winning 0, and Polmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Humbert has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.27 while Polmans has played against players with an average rank of 332.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Humbert has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polmans has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Humbert has converted 39.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polmans has converted 48.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Humbert 1 - 1 Polmans
15
Rank
13
High
25
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
197
Rank
116
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
62% (323-201)
Career Total W/L
56% (324-254)
70% (19-8)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$3,627,415
Career Prize Money
$579,380
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ugo Humbert | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:30 | 2:15:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (125/182) | 65% (115/177) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (88/125) | 70% (81/115) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (23/57) | 50% (31/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 28% (5/18) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (65/177) | 39% (71/182) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Marc Polmans
Player
Ugo Humbert
73%
(
86 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
39 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
126
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Marc Polmans
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ugo Humbert | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (19/8) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 43% (16/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (357/289) | 49% (166/176) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 148 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:3 | 1:51:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 85.15 | 335.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1317/1980) | 67% (722/1084) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (947/1317) | 69% (496/722) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (377/663) | 48% (172/362) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (75/192) | 49% (39/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (775/2020) | 37% (376/1024) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 79% (11/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (17/24) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 0% (7/0) |
Ugo Humbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Ugo Humbert
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | bye | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ugo Humbert
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Ugo Humbert
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Federico Coria
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Ugo Humbert
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
75 of
94)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
10
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Humbert Vs Polmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ugo Humbert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
