Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Viktor Durasovic vs Jesper DE Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Durasovic vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Viktor Durasovic vs Jesper DE Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Durasovic has won 51.1% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Durasovic, in recent form, has won 52.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Durasovic has saved 56.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Durasovic has won 47.76% of matches played (W/L 32/ 35), with Jong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Durasovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 166/ 98), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Jong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Durasovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 15/ 21), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Durasovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.22 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Durasovic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Durasovic has converted 40.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Durasovic 0 - 0 Jong
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Viktor Durasovic | Jesper DE Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (21/16) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (48/39) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (430/409) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 151 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 96 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 235.7 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1503/2573) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1024/1503) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (546/1070) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (115/280) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1098/2669) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 61% (14/9) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (21/37) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 28% (18/5) | 1st Match |
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Viktor Durasovic
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Henrik Bladelius
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Alex Rybakov
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Petr Nouza
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Marcello Serafini
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Durasovic Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
