Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yannik Steinegger vs Alessandro Ceppellini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Steinegger vs Ceppellini analysis and find out who is favored!
Yannik Steinegger vs Alessandro Ceppellini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Steinegger 2 - 0 Ceppellini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Steinegger has won 42.17% of points on his second serve, while Ceppellini has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Steinegger, in recent form, has won 45.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ceppellini has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Steinegger has saved 57.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ceppellini has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Steinegger has won 42.42% of matches played (W/L 14/ 19), with Ceppellini winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Steinegger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 46/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Ceppellini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 99/ 105), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Steinegger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17), where as Ceppellini has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Steinegger winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Steinegger winning 4 and Ceppellini winning 1. The last match between Steinegger and Ceppellini was at the M25 Klosters, 15-09-2020, Q3, Clay with Yannik Steinegger getting the victory 6-4 4-6 10-6.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:50:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Steinegger and Ceppellini have played a deciding set 1 times, with Steinegger winning 1 times and Ceppellini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Steinegger winning 0, and Ceppellini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Steinegger has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.52 while Ceppellini has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Steinegger has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ceppellini has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Steinegger has converted 30% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ceppellini has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
873
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
55% (138-113)
Career Total W/L
47% (103-114)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Steinegger VS Ceppellini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Yannik Steinegger | Alessandro Ceppellini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 32 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:50:30 | 0:50:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (45/80) | 55% (36/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (28/45) | 58% (21/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (15/35) | 48% (14/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 31% (5/16) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (30/65) | 46% (37/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Steinegger VS Ceppellini H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 10-6 |
Stats 
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yannik Steinegger | Alessandro Ceppellini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (97/113) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 16.3 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (376/586) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (271/376) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (92/210) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (11/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (200/593) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Yannik Steinegger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Yannik Steinegger
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yannik Steinegger
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alec Beckley
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
119)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
9
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
56 of
76)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
41 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Liam Gavrielides
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Dominique Graf
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Antoine Walch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alessandro Ceppellini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilien Voisin
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Ivan Karlo Ban
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Mark Mitchell
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-7(2) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Steinegger Vs Ceppellini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
