Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yusuke Takahashi vs Sho Shimabukuro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Takahashi vs Shimabukuro analysis and find out who is favored!
Yusuke Takahashi vs Sho Shimabukuro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Takahashi 2 - 0 Shimabukuro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Takahashi has won 55.58% of points on his second serve, while Shimabukuro has won 49.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Takahashi, in recent form, has won 50.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimabukuro has won 49.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.9% and 27.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Takahashi has saved 63.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimabukuro has saved 55.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Takahashi has won 50% of matches played (W/L 31/ 31), with Shimabukuro winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Takahashi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 25/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15). Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Takahashi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/ 21), where as Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Takahashi winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Takahashi winning 4 and Shimabukuro winning 0. The last match between Takahashi and Shimabukuro was at the Japan F7 (Tokyo), 09-06-2017, Quarterfinals, Hard with Yusuke Takahashi getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Takahashi and Shimabukuro have played a deciding set 0 times, with Takahashi winning 0 times and Shimabukuro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Takahashi winning 0, and Shimabukuro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Takahashi has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.53 while Shimabukuro has played against players with an average rank of 295.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Takahashi has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimabukuro has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Takahashi has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimabukuro has converted 54.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
467
Rank
238
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
56% (262-210)
Career Total W/L
62% (215-133)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
26% (5-14)
$19,385
Career Prize Money
$196,505
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Takahashi VS Shimabukuro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Yusuke Takahashi | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:30 | 1:28:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (53/109) | 53% (76/144) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (41/53) | 63% (48/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (24/56) | 34% (23/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (11/26) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (73/144) | 40% (44/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Takahashi VS Shimabukuro H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yusuke Takahashi | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 26% (5/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (25/23) | 35% (15/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (238/216) | 45% (186/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (10/9) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:18 | 1:31:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.67 | 317.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (959/1376) | 57% (722/1258) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (620/959) | 68% (489/722) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (230/417) | 49% (264/536) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (60/145) | 55% (40/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (520/1328) | 35% (400/1151) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (10/8) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 28% (5/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (11/0) |
Yusuke Takahashi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
11 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Mikalai Haliak
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Liam Gavrielides
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Takahashi Vs Shimabukuro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
